Reflections on the Year of Protests

By Callen Harty
Solidarity fist
Solidarity fist. (Sat, 3/19)

The end of the year is traditionally a time to look back and reflect upon the previous year, to think about what events ultimately had meaning, and to look forward to creating a new reality in a new year. Often when we read the year-end summaries in newspapers we find there are a lot of things that happened that were quickly forgotten, even when they seemed important at the moment. Sometimes there are things that maybe should have been forgotten that are still in the collective consciousness. Other events take on greater meaning with the passage and contemplation of time. On a smaller scale the same thing happens in our own lives—the argument that was important enough to talk about for weeks is forgotten by the end of the year, but something that seemed like a minor event still has an impact months and months later and grows in significance as time moves forward.

For me—and I’m betting for many Wisconsinites—this past year was monumental. There were political events that played out here that had an impact that still resonates and those events are still growing in their significance, not just for Wisconsin, but for the whole country. Much of my year was consumed with the political ramifications of the Wisconsin Uprising back in February and March, when tens upon tens of thousands of citizens descended upon the State Capitol to protest the policies of new governor, Scott Walker. Most of those protesters left after the Republicans snuck the bill through by removing the financial elements from it, nakedly revealing their true intentions. But some of us continued fighting throughout the year, and at various times during the year masses of others came back several times. The protests never ended despite the wishes and pretensions of Walker, his fellow Republicans, and the media.

The protests were not all that occurred in my life in 2011. There were significant personal events as well. I jumped out of an airplane for the first time. I flew a helicopter. I saw several great concerts and met or photographed several famous people. I was there when the Packers came back to Green Bay with their championship trophy. I had articles published in Our Lives, Life After Hate, forwardseeking.com, and The Progressive. I had photographs published in several places. For the first time one of my plays (Invisible Boy) was produced outside of Madison. I had a car totaled and replaced. I had a book accepted for publication. My youth theater group, Proud Theater, expanded to another city. I worked with my state Representative to introduce a bill in the Legislature—it’s in the draft stage right now. I took trips to Benton Harbor, Chicago, Omaha, Dubuque, San Antonio, and various places in Wisconsin. I lost and gained people in my life. But despite all that, when I look back at 2011 I will remember it as the year of protests. It was what defined the year and it was what consumed me from mid-February through the end of the year and will continue into the next.

To be honest I was not a fan of Scott Walker from the beginning. Before he got into office he had already made it clear that he was going to turn down federal funding for high-speed rail and that he wanted to change wind power rules in a way that would make it more difficult for firms to develop wind power here. Both of those decisions would cost the state jobs despite Walker’s claims that he was going to create a quarter of a million new jobs. Already by January Walker had introduced legislation to build upon wetlands in Green Bay, to make it more difficult for people to sue large companies, to reorganize the Department of Commerce into a semi-private organization (with non-union employees instead of the previous state employees), and to start giveaways to corporate benefactors through a package of tax breaks. When I went to the annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Day celebration at the Capitol in mid-January I was tempted to stand up and turn my back on him when he spoke, but decided against it out of respect for the event. Those bills all passed the Legislature by the end of his first month in office.

In mid-February Walker introduced his “budget repair” bill that caused the firestorm of protest that followed at the Capitol. The bill essentially gutted state employee unions, leaving them with virtually no power to collectively bargain. But in addition the bill also allowed Walker to sell state heating plants in a no-bid process and set up the demise of Medicaid. The bill made it possible for a Legislative committee, headed by Republican supporters of Walker, to end or reform Medicaid in whatever way they wanted with no input from the full Legislature or the public. Walker’s head of the state health department had been quoted in the past as saying that Medicaid should not even exist. If the bills passed in January hadn’t been signal enough, the “budget repair” bill clearly signaled a conservative assault upon much of what was important to Wisconsin citizens. I contend to this day that if Walker had introduced the bill in a normal manner and let it go through its normal legislative process most of the state wouldn’t have noticed until it was too late. People typically don’t pay attention to budget deliberations. But he introduced it in a special jobs session and insisted that it be passed within a week. It made people wonder what was up and caused a closer look from the public than it might have gotten otherwise.

By late February the budget itself was introduced. It cut education funding by one and a half billion dollars and prevented local governments from raising property taxes to make up the difference. Walker continued to talk about the “tools” he had given municipalities to help them out, but one local school district after the other announced they had to lay off teachers and other personnel. The only ones who used the “tools” the bill provided were school districts in conservative communities that used the language of the bill to further erode unions in their districts.

But for me the battle was never just about the unions. While I have always supported unions and appreciated what they have done for the working class of this country, the bills that Walker and his cronies pushed through were about much more than just the unions, and the way they pushed them through was not the way of open and honest government in Wisconsin. Debate was cut off, Parliamentary maneuvering was used to rush or silence votes, and the public was allowed little to no input at all. Walker and the Legislature assaulted the very foundation of our society and undermined the compacts by which we had lived for decades. The governor was out to destroy unions, social safety networks, and any other progressive tradition that he could while the Republicans had control of the governorship, both houses, and the judiciary. Some of those conservative battles—to overturn the ban on the death penalty, as well as to fight against queer rights and reproductive freedom—are yet to come, though there have been early signs such as the refusal to defend the state’s domestic partner registry in court and the cutting of funding for sexual assault services because of real or perceived ties to Planned Parenthood and abortion services. To me the Walker agenda was an all-out assault on our proud progressive tradition and on the working class and poor of Wisconsin and he had not campaigned on what he was suddenly proclaiming a mandate.

Most people think of the February 14 Teaching Assistants’ Association (TAA) delivery of Valentine’s Day cards to the governor’s office as the first protest because of John Nichols’ repeated use of that story in his speeches during the course of the protests. But I have a note from February 13 about a protest that had been held on Saturday, February 12, only one day after Walker introduced the “budget repair” bill. While it may have been small at first, people reacted quickly to the bill and day by day the protests grew. By February 15, I felt I needed to be part of it. I felt called to be there. I asked my boss for the following day off of work to go protest and was given the okay, so Wednesday, February 16 was my first day at the Capitol protests. On that day thousands of other people showed up. It was probably 10,000 or so. Soon it grew to 40,000, then 70,000, all the way up to somewhere between 100,000-150,000 people protesting at the Capitol. After my first day there I ended up showing up at the Capitol virtually every day after that, on weekdays and weekends, with the exception of a couple weeks when I was ill and when I was absent due to trips out of town.

My purpose was two-fold. I wanted to be there to protest what was happening to my state, but I also wanted to document the reaction to it. As a result I have thousands of photographs and quite a few essays and notes about all of it. As a protester I was one of thousands. I’m sure there were many people who showed up every day who were among those thousands and who were never noticed. Their names will never be recorded in the histories of what happened. But each of them was important to the movement. Without them it would not have been possible. My involvement became more noticeable as others went back to their jobs and their homes and some fighters remained behind. Most of the ones who remained fighting every day, even after the fourteen Senators had come home and even after the “budget repair” and budget bills had passed, ended up becoming friends. It became a beautiful family of protesters.

Sometimes a person feels called to do something. An inner voice or spirit simply puts it out there and a person has to respond to the calling. Being a man who had a life-long fear of singing in public I would not have thought that I would start to sing by myself every day in the Capitol rotunda, but it was one of the directions my protest muse took me. At the time, back in the latter part of March, several protesters had been getting arrested every day for holding signs in the public space on the first floor of the rotunda–not in one of the offices or closed off areas. My niece was among them, as were Jeremy Ryan, Valerie Walasek, and others. One day while they were there with their signs I wondered if a protest song would cause a citizen to be arrested or whether the authorities were concerned only with the signs. So I got a couple friends to join me in a rendition of “We Shall Overcome”. We did not get arrested. But I felt the power of the song and within about a week I had started to sing the song by myself on the ground floor of the Capitol. I have been doing it virtually every day since. It became well-known enough that I was asked to sing the song for the “Thunda Around the Rotunda” rally on April 30. I went from being afraid to sing in front of people to leading more than a thousand people in song.

Musicians marching up State Street
Musicians marching up State Street. (Sat, 3/19)

The protests against Walker were not the only protests and rallies happening, either. Throughout the year I attended numerous other rallies, including the Day of Silence march, the annual gay pride rally, several civil rights rallies, peace demonstrations, a housing rights rally, May Day, immigrant rights, and an anti-Nazi rally in West Allis, among others. What I noticed this year was how many of the people at each of those rallies were also part of the demonstrations at the Capitol. Something I had always known was confirmed for me–that the battle for queer rights is the same battle as the one for racial justice, the struggle for immigrant rights is the same as the struggle for union rights, the desire to raise the poor from lives of poverty is the desire to raise all of our humanity higher. This is what the whole concept of the 99% is all about—that we are all in this together, but that in order to win justice in this world, we must all work together toward that goal. The demonstrations at the Capitol were ultimately about social and economic justice, not about Scott Walker.

I also traveled a bit, attending anti-Walker protests in Whitewater, Janesville, Devil’s Lake, Green Bay, and as far away as Benton Harbor, Michigan. They told the same story as all of the other rallies I attended. We could all see that our battle was Benton Harbor’s battle, which was New York City’s battle, and Seattle’s, and everywhere else where the Occupy movement took hold midway through the year. Wisconsin led the way to a nationwide movement which continues to this day and which does not seem to be ebbing in any way, despite police crackdowns, raids, and false arrests. In fact, the more the police crack down the stronger the movement seems to become.

I was threatened with arrest three times in 2011 and I had never before had so much as a moving traffic violation. The first was for singing “We Shall Overcome” in the Capitol rotunda without a permit. I finished the song and then had a long discussion with the officer about my rights of free speech. He disagreed with me, but didn’t really have a legitimate legal reason to do so–and that kind of cop can be a very dangerous cop, when they try to enforce laws they don’t understand or do so out of political motivations rather than legal ones. I followed that up by contacting my State Senator, Mark Miller, and the Capitol Police Chief, Charles Tubbs. In the meantime I continued my daily song, except I did it with lyrics on poster board and my mouth taped shut. Several of the Solidarity Sing Along singers joined me and gave voice to the song while I displayed the lyrics. Chief Tubbs met with me and a staff person from Mark Miller’s office about half a week later. I arrived at the meeting with a packet of material, including Constitutional snippets, the entire Department of Administration code on building use (which was much shorter then), and more. I pointed out inconsistencies in their own policy and let him know that while I came to the meeting without an attorney I had one ready to file suit over the possible violation of my Constitutional rights. A couple days after that the Chief called to tell me he had informed his officers that it was okay for me to continue doing what I had been doing. I believe he knew that I would pursue it and he would lose a court case. I removed the tape the next day and have continued singing the song with no incident since that day.

The second arrest threat occurred on August 25, when a group of protesters refused to leave the Capitol building. I was not one of them, but I stayed in the building to photograph and videotape what I was sure would be the arrests of several protesters. After the last of them had been hauled downstairs Chief Tubbs had an officer go around the room and get the names of all the press people who had remained behind to document the arrests. I had told him I was with the press because earlier in the evening I had introduced myself to Matt Rothschild of The Progressive when I saw that he was there taking notes and I had asked Matt if he wanted me to e-mail him photographs. He had given me his card and said that he’d be particularly interested in shots of the actual arrests, which he also knew were coming. I took that as good enough to say I was with the press. But Tubbs announced that if he found out anyone who stayed behind did not have official press credentials they might very well be arrested in the following days. I explained my situation to the officer taking my name and never heard more about it. I believe that Tubbs remembered me from our earlier meeting and wanted to give me a little scare.

Later in the year I was finally arrested for the first time in my life–for videotaping the proceedings of the Assembly from the gallery. There had been a couple weeks of protesters getting arrested for carrying signs, photographing, and videotaping in the Assembly gallery. That night eighteen of us were arrested for standing up for our Constitutional rights. The Wisconsin open meetings law allows the public to photograph or videotape public meetings, and the official Assembly rules don’t prohibit it, but there were other rules posted at the door stating that it was not allowed. All eighteen of the cases, and virtually every other arrest that has been made since the protests started in March, were dismissed.

Now that the recalls of Governor Walker and Lieutenant Governor Kleefisch are in gear, I am collecting petition signatures for that. On Christmas Day I received one of the best gifts I have received in years when I visited my 86 year old mother, a lifelong New Deal Democrat, and got her to sign both petitions. This is where my focus is right now, and that will shift to the campaign after the recall petitions are turned in and verified. And still I go to the Capitol virtually every day to sing four verses of “We Shall Overcome”. It does my spirit good and keeps my mind on the target, which is not the recall of Governor Walker, but the pursuit of equality for all, regardless of color, orientation, degree of wealth, or anything else. This movement is about so much more than Scott Walker. It is about the heart and soul of my state and my nation.

A peace flag and a line of riot police

From Rock Musician to Anti-Slavery Activist

By Jaeah Lee 
Mother Jones

Justin Dillon with Tremolo in 2007.Tremolo/MySpace 

You’ve probably never heard of Justin Dillon or his band, Tremolo. After all, until fairly recently, his career was pretty unremarkable: By 2003, Tremolo had developed a following playing the usual tour circuits. They’d even landed tracks on a few films and television shows, including How to Deal, a romantic comedy starring Mandy Moore, and were awaiting an offer from Capitol Records to cut their first album.

“It was a weird phase where Capitol had a hold on us and we were all excited,” Dillon recalls earlier this month as we sit in his sun-basked office in Oakland, California’s iconic Tribune Tower. Wispy haired with hazel eyes, Dillon sports a militaristic look: khaki-green Mao cap, dark-washed jeans, black boots, 10 o’clock shadow.

Not wanting to sit around stressing about the record deal—which never materialized—the band accepted an invitation from a nonprofit to spend a week performing in a remote corner of Eastern Europe. Soon, Tremolo was in a town in Kalmykia, a Russian territory bordering the Black Sea. “Like, way the hell out there,” Dillon says. “It wasn’t hard to impress people because there was nothing to compare us to.”

There, the musicians befriended local kids who spoke of hopeful plans of leaving to work in America. On a hunch, Dillon pressed them for details. It soon became clear that some of these young people were unwittingly setting themselves up to be sold on the slave-labor market. The singer, who had no previous experience in activism, wanted to do something about it, but he didn’t know what. So after returning from Russia, he cold-called a few human-rights activists. “I’m not popular or anything,” he recalls telling one. “But I’ll do anything to help.”

The call led to more calls, culminating over several years into Call + Response, a 2008 musical documentary featuring artists like Natasha Bedingfield, Matisyahu, and Imogen Heap, and interviews with the likes of Madeleine Albright, Cornel West, and Nicholas Kristof. Dillon had never made a film before, but he had friends who had. After his years of recording and producing songs, he says, editing footage came naturally.Call + Response had a limited release in 50 theaters across the US, but it sold out nearly every night. Dillon was hailed as an “accidental filmmaker,” a musician who set out to combat modern slavery. Read story at Mother Jones 

                                  © Mother Jones

Media Depicts U.S. Juvenile Detention Facilities as Rehabilitative

Courtesy of The Real News

Bart Lubow: Youth Prisons are places of violence, of arbitrary exercise of power, and are fundamentally dehumanizing.

Forward Seeking Related:
Courtesy of 

Let Our Farmers Grow – Common Dreams 

Declaration of the Occupation of New York City

By NYC General Assembly

Declaration of the Occupation of New York City

As we gather together in solidarity to express a feeling of mass injustice, we must not lose sight of what brought us together. We write so that all people who feel wronged by the corporate forces of the world can know that we are your allies.

As one people, united, we acknowledge the reality: that the future of the human race requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their neighbors; that a democratic government derives its just power from the people, but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth; and that no true democracy is attainable when the process is determined by economic power. We come to you at a time when corporations, which place profit over people, self-interest over justice, and oppression over equality, run our governments. We have peaceably assembled here, as is our right, to let these facts be known.

They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process, despite not having the original mortgage.

They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity, and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.

They have perpetuated inequality and discrimination in the workplace based on age, the color of one’s skin, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation.

They have poisoned the food supply through negligence, and undermined the farming system through monopolization.

They have profited off of the torture, confinement, and cruel treatment of countless nonhuman animals, and actively hide these practices.

They have continuously sought to strip employees of the right to negotiate for better pay and safer working conditions.

They have held students hostage with tens of thousands of dollars of debt on education, which is itself a human right.

They have consistently outsourced labor and used that outsourcing as leverage to cut workers’ healthcare and pay.

They have influenced the courts to achieve the same rights as people, with none of the culpability or responsibility.

They have spent millions of dollars on legal teams that look for ways to get them out of contracts in regards to health insurance.

They have sold our privacy as a commodity.

They have used the military and police force to prevent freedom of the press.

They have deliberately declined to recall faulty products endangering lives in pursuit of profit.

They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.

They have donated large sums of money to politicians supposed to be regulating them.

They continue to block alternate forms of energy to keep us dependent on oil.

They continue to block generic forms of medicine that could save people’s lives in order to protect investments that have already turned a substantive profit.

They have purposely covered up oil spills, accidents, faulty bookkeeping, and inactive ingredients in pursuit of profit.

They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media.

They have accepted private contracts to murder prisoners even when presented with serious doubts about their guilt.

They have perpetuated colonialism at home and abroad.

They have participated in the torture and murder of innocent civilians overseas.

They continue to create weapons of mass destruction in order to receive government contracts.*

To the people of the world,

We, the New York City General Assembly occupying Wall Street in Liberty Square, urge you to assert your power.

Exercise your right to peaceably assemble; occupy public space; create a process to address the problems we face, and generate solutions accessible to everyone.

To all communities that take action and form groups in the spirit of direct democracy, we offer support, documentation, and all of the resources at our disposal.

Join us and make your voices heard!

*These grievances are not all-inclusive.

SPLC Study Finds that More than Half of States Fail at Teaching the Civil Rights Movement

Courtesy of Southern Poverty Law Center

Though the civil rights movement is one of the defining events of U.S. history, most states fail when it comes to teaching the movement to students, a first-of-its-kind study released today by the Southern Poverty Law Center has found.

The study – Teaching the Movement: The State of Civil Rights Education 2011   examined state standards and curriculum requirements related to the study of the modern civil rights movement for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It was conducted by the SPLC’s Teaching Tolerance program and includes a forward by noted civil rights activist and historian Julian Bond.

The study compared the requirements in state standards to a body of knowledge that reflects what civil rights historians and educators consider core information about the civil rights movement. It found that:

  • A shocking number of states – 35 – received grades of “F.”
  • Sixteen states, where local officials set specific policies and requirements for their school districts, have no requirements at all for teaching about the movement.
  • Only three states received a grade of “A” – Alabama, New York and Florida – and even these states have considerable room for improvement.
  • Generally speaking, the farther from the South – and the smaller the African-American population – the less attention paid to the movement.

“For too many students, their civil rights education boils down to two people and four words: Rosa Parks, Dr. King and ‘I have a dream,’” said Maureen Costello, SPLC’s Teaching Tolerance director. “When 43 states adopted Common Core Standards in English and math, they affirmed that rigorous standards were necessary for achievement. By having weak or non-existent standards for history, particularly for the civil rights movement, they are saying loud and clear that it isn’t something students need to learn.”

The SPLC issued the report to encourage a national conversation about the importance of teaching the civil rights movement. The report calls for states to include civil rights education in K-12 history and social studies curricula. It urges colleges and other organizations that train teachers to ensure that they are well prepared to teach it.

Most of the states that earned grades of “C” or better are in the South – suggesting that most states view the civil rights movement as something of regional significance or of interest only to black students rather than a matter of national significance.

The study also found that when states teach the civil rights movement, they tend to perform well on teaching leaders and events. They are considerably less likely to include the obstacles that civil rights activists faced, like racism and white resistance, or to mention more than civil rights related-holidays to students before they reach high school.

“An educated populace must be taught basics about American history,” said Julian Bond in his preface to the report. ”One of these basics is the civil rights movement, a nonviolent revolution as important as the first American Revolution. It is a history that continues to shape the America we all live in today.”

Teaching Tolerance is dedicated to reducing prejudice, improving intergroup relations and supporting equitable school experiences for our nation’s children. It produces and distributes tools at no cost to teachers, including Teaching Tolerance magazine, online curricula and professional development resources, and multimedia teaching kits that introduce students to various civil rights issues.

Every Great Social Movement

By David Korten
Via Yes Magazine

David Korten: The biggest shifts of our time have been sparked by ordinary people rejecting the cultural stories that dominated them.

This is part of a series of blogs based on excerpts adapted from the 2nd edition of Agenda for a New Economy: From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth. I wrote Agenda to spur a national conversation on economic policy issues and options that are otherwise largely ignored. This blog series is intended to contribute to that conversation. —DK

Every great social movement begins with a set of ideas validated, internalized, and then shared and amplified through media, grassroots organizations, and thousands, even millions, of conversations. A truth strikes a resonant chord, we hear it acknowledged by others, and we begin to discuss it with friends and associates.The new story spreads out in multiple ever-widening circles that begin to connect and intermingle.

A story of unrealized possibility gradually replaces the falsified story that affirmed the status quo. The prevailing culture begins to shift, and the collective behavior of the society shifts with it.

For the civil rights and women’s movements, the old story said:

Women and people of color have no soul. Less than human, they have no natural rights. They can find fulfillment only through faithful service to their white male masters.

A profound cultural shift occurred between 1950 and 1980 as the consequence of a growing rejection of these stories in favor of a new story that recognized and affirmed the full humanity and rights of all people.

It began with the civil rights movement, inspired in part by the words and writing of W. E. B. DuBois, founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). His ideas were carried forward by others such as the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. Communicated through books, periodicals, and speeches, these ideas inspired and shaped countless conversations, particularly in black churches, about race and the possibilities of integration based on a full recognition of the inherent humanity of people all races. Read story

 

“I’d Rather Have a Life than a Pile of Money” Peter Buffett

By Fran Korten | Yes Magazine

Peter Buffett, Warren Buffett’s son, on his family wealth, his music career, and his commitment to social justice.

Recently Peter Buffett, son of famed billionaire Warren Buffett, talked with YES! Magazine Publisher Fran Korten, about his new book Life is What You Make It and the choice points of his life.

Fran Korten: As the son of a multi-billionaire, isn’t it a bit audacious to write a book advising others on how to live their lives? What gave you the courage to write this book? 

Peter Buffett: Yeah, when you see my last name and my book title, “Life is What You Make It,” you’re probably thinking, “easy for you to say.” But that’s why I wrote it. People would say to me “You’re so normal,” and I thought, “Why is that?” I grew up in a household that, at its core, was about egalitarianism, humanitarianism. I didn’t think there was any reason to feel entitled or special. When people started to put that assumption on me, I thought, “Well, this could be interesting to try to bust that assumption.” If I can help redefine success and privilege then I think it’s my duty to do it. If I can show up vulnerable and real, I think it gives other people permission to show up vulnerable and real.

Fran Korten: Your book is about choice points in life. Like that moment when you’re listening to a tape of your own music in a beat-up Honda Civic at the beach and suddenly you see that your future is in music. When you informed your parents, how did they react?

Peter Buffett: They were wonderfully supportive. They knew I loved music all my life. So it wasn’t some crazy idea to them. I was also fortunate that I had recently inherited Berkshire-Hathaway shares worth $90,000. So my dad said, “Look, here’s what you should do. Take a year off, you can spend x amount of dollars and it won’t eat into the principal.”  Please read more!

Blood Into Gold – Peter Buffett featuring Akon